Identifying Gaps and Future Research Agenda: Key Success Factors of Digital Transformation Adoption

Main Article Content

Amando Jr. Pimentel Singun

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to advance knowledge for managers, policymakers, and researchers regarding the important key factors of successful Digital Transformation (DT) adoption, which can shed light on research gaps and help form a research agenda. A systematic literature review was conducted to analyse 26 peer-reviewed journal articles published between 2020 and 2025 from the Scopus, Emerald, Insight, Google Scholar, and ProQuest databases, following the PRISMA guidelines. Four DT adoption models, such as Diffusion of Innovation (DOI), Technology Acceptance Model (TAM), Task-Technology Fit (TTF), and Theory of Planned Behaviour (TPB), have been analysed to understand why people embrace DT either positively or negatively. According to the literature, the success factors for adopting DT have been identified. In addition, it is found that using only one DT adoption model does not ensure success. It is advisable to use an integrated multi-model or multiple frameworks for the theoretical adoption of DT. Using multiple frameworks makes DT adoption easier to understand. The Input-Process Output (IPO) schema allows consolidating the gaps in the present state and setting out the research agenda. The IPO schema can be considered a helpful tool for identifying research gaps and setting the research agenda, as well as for planning, decision-making, and policymaking.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

Section

Articles

How to Cite

[1]
Amando Jr. Pimentel Singun , Tran., “Identifying Gaps and Future Research Agenda: Key Success Factors of Digital Transformation Adoption”, IJITEE, vol. 15, no. 9, pp. 7–16, Aug. 2026, doi: 10.35940/ijitee.J1299.15090826.
Share |

References

International Telecommunication Union, “Measuring digital development ICT Development Index 2025,” Measuring digital development ICT Development Index 2025. Accessed: Jul. 22, 2025. [Online]. Available: https://www.itu.int/itu-d/reports/statistics/idi2025

J. Paul and A. R. Criado, “The art of writing literature review: What do we know and what do we need to know?” International Business Review, vol. 29, no. 4, p. 101717, Aug. 2020, DOI: 10.1016/j.ibusrev.2020.101717.

M. J. Page et al., “The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews,” BMJ, p. n71, Mar. 2021, DOI: 10.1136/bmj.n71.

S. Rana and Pragati, “A Bibliometric and Visualization Analysis of Human Capital and Sustainability,” Vision: The Journal of Business Perspective, vol. 28, no. 3, pp. 303–312, Jun. 2024, DOI: 10.1177/09722629221105773.

H. Gabay, I. Reychav, and G. M. Jonathan, “Transformative shift: Digital evolution in Israeli public sector agencies during an emergency period,” Procedia Computer Science, vol. 256, pp. 496–503, 2025, DOI: 10.1016/j.procs.2025.02.145.

S.-M. Tseng, “Determinants of the Intention to Use Digital Technology,” Information, vol. 16, no. 3, p. 170, Feb. 2025, DOI: 10.3390/info16030170.

Y. Wang, D. Hong, and J. Huang, “A Diffusion of Innovation Perspective for Digital Transformation on Education,” Procedia Computer Science, vol. 225, pp. 2439–2448, 2023, DOI: 10.1016/j.procs.2023.10.235.

M. Wójcik, K. Dmochowska-Dudek, and P. Tobiasz-Lis, “Boosting the Potential for GeoDesign: Digitalisation of the System of Spatial Planning as a Trigger for Smart Rural Development,” Energies, vol. 14, no. 13, p. 3895, Jun. 2021, DOI: 10.3390/en14133895.

M. Jocevski, A. Ghezzi, and N. Arvidsson, “Exploring the growth challenge of mobile payment platforms: A business model perspective,” Electronic Commerce Research and Applications, vol. 40, p. 100908, Mar. 2020, DOI: 10.1016/j.elerap.2019.100908.

F. Wurster et al., “Roger’s diffusion of innovations theory and the adoption of a patient portal’s digital anamnesis collection tool: study protocol for the MAiBest project,” Implement Sci Commun, vol. 5, no. 1, Jul. 2024, DOI: 10.1186/s43058-024-00614-8.

S. V. Jin and E. Ryu, “Unraveling the dynamics of digital equality and trust in AI-empowered metaverses and AI-VR-convergence,” Technological Forecasting and Social Change, vol. 210, p. 123877, Jan. 2025, DOI: 10.1016/j.techfore.2024.123877.

G. Rouleau et al., “Mapping Theories, Models, and Frameworks to Evaluate Digital Health Interventions: Scoping Review,” J Med Internet Res, vol. 26, p. e51098, Feb. 2024, DOI: 10.2196/51098.

I. Moumtzidis, M. Kamariotou, and F. Kitsios, “Digital Transformation Strategies Enabled by Internet of Things and Big Data Analytics: The Use-Case of Telecommunication Companies in Greece,” Information, vol. 13, no. 4, p. 196, Apr. 2022, DOI: 10.3390/info13040196.

Y. Liu and Y. Shi, “Digital transformation of college teacher education from the perspective of behaviorist psychology: initiatives, effectiveness and pitfalls,” Applied Mathematics and Nonlinear Sciences, vol. 9, no. 1, Jan. 2024, DOI: 10.2478/amns.2023.2.01598.

M. F. A. U. Nuha, A. Muklason, and Y. Agustiawan, “Enhancing Administrative Efficiency in Pondok Pesantren: Exploring the Acceptance of E-Santren App System for Administrative Tasks,” Procedia Computer Science, vol. 234, pp. 795–804, 2024, DOI: 10.1016/j.procs.2024.03.096.

K.-H. Wang, “Beyond digital finance: The impact of internet banking adoption on subjective life satisfaction,” Finance Research Open, vol. 1, no. 2, p. 100012, Jun. 2025, DOI: 10.1016/j.finr.2025.100012.

F. Kitsios, I. Giatsidis, and M. Kamariotou, “Digital Transformation and Strategy in the Banking Sector: Evaluating the Acceptance Rate of E-Services,” Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, vol. 7, no. 3, p. 204, Sep. 2021, DOI: 10.3390/joitmc7030204.

M. Salzmann-Erikson, A. Olsson, M. Rezagholi, D. Fjellström, and A. Osarenkhoe, “Bridging technostress and continuous learning in knowledge-intensive organizations: A socio-technical systems approach for the future of healthy working life,” J. Infras. Policy. Dev., vol. 8, no. 13, p. 8938, Nov. 2024, DOI: 10.24294/jipd8938.

H.-H. Hsiung and J.-L. Wang, “Research on the Introduction of a Robotic Process Automation (RPA) System in Small Accounting Firms in Taiwan,” Economies, vol. 10, no. 8, p. 200, Aug. 2022, DOI: 10.3390/economies10080200.

O. Ali, A. Shrestha, A. Jaradat, and A. Al-Ahmad, “An Evaluation of Key Adoption Factors towards Using the Fog Technology,” BDCC, vol. 6, no. 3, p. 81, Jul. 2022, DOI: 10.3390/bdcc6030081.

V. Kirinić, D. Čerepinko, and I. Rosanda Žigo, “Factor Analysis of Croatian Secondary School Teachers’ Readiness for Digital Transformation,” Social Sciences, vol. 12, no. 12, p. 650, Nov. 2023, DOI: 10.3390/socsci12120650.

I. Park, D. Kim, J. Moon, S. Kim, Y. Kang, and S. Bae, “Searching for New Technology Acceptance Model under Social Context: Analyzing the Determinants of Acceptance of Intelligent Information Technology in Digital Transformation and Implications for the Requisites of Digital Sustainability,” Sustainability, vol. 14, no. 1, p. 579, Jan. 2022, DOI: 10.3390/su14010579.

B. Dash, P. Sharma, and S. Swayamsiddha, “Organizational Digital Transformations and the Importance of Assessing Theoretical Frameworks such as TAM, TTF, and UTAUT: A Review,” IJACSA, vol. 14, no. 2, 2023, DOI: 10.14569/ijacsa.2023.0140201.

M. E. Isharyani, B. M. Sopha, B. Tjahjono, and M. A. Wibisono, “Exploring the Smart Retail Scenario for Traditional Retailers: Case Studies from a Developing Country,” IEEE Trans. Eng. Manage., vol. 71, pp. 9325–9341, 2024, DOI: 10.1109/tem.2023.3316996.

E. S. Nkwei, P. Rambe, and A. Simba, “Entrepreneurial intention: The role of the perceived benefits of digital technology,” South African Journal of Economic and Management Sciences, vol. 26, no. 1, May 2023, DOI: 10.4102/sajems.v26i1.4936.

Y. Yang, G. Chen, Z. Hu, and J. Zheng, “Driving Digital Success: How Managerial Readiness Shapes Strategic Decisions in Digital Transformation,” Journal of Global Information Management, vol. 32, no. 1, pp. 1–25, Dec. 2024, DOI: 10.4018/jgim.365204.

A. Chowdhury, K. H. Kabir, M. McQuire, and D. P. Bureau, “The dynamics of digital technology adoption in rainbow trout aquaculture: Exploring multi-stakeholder perceptions in Ontario using Q methodology and the theory of planned behaviour,” Aquaculture, vol. 594, p. 741460, Jan. 2025, DOI: 10.1016/j.aquaculture.2024.741460.

S. Zhao, W. Duan, D. Zhao, and Q. Song, “Identifying the influence factors of residents’ low-carbon behavior under the background of ‘Carbon Neutrality’: An empirical study of Qingdao city, China,” Energy Reports, vol. 8, pp. 6876–6886, Nov. 2022, DOI: 10.1016/j.egyr.2022.05.023.

B. Esposito, M. R. Sessa, D. Sica, and O. Malandrino, “Service innovation in the restaurant sector during COVID-19: digital technologies to reduce customers’ risk perception,” TQM, vol. 34, no. 7, pp. 134–164, Dec. 2022, DOI: 10.1108/tqm-01-2022-0016.

D. Cetindamar, B. Abedin, and K. Shirahada, “The Role of Employees in Digital Transformation: A Preliminary Study on How Employees’ Digital Literacy Impacts Use of Digital Technologies,” IEEE Trans. Eng. Manage., vol. 71, pp. 7837–7848, 2024, DOI: 10.1109/tem.2021.3087724.

N. Larasati, A. A. Putri, A. S. Soemodinoto, N. Alyssa, and O. S. Shoofiyani, “Unified theory of acceptance and use of technology model to understand farmer’s readiness: Implementation of precision agriculture based on digital IoT monitoring apps in West Java, Indonesia,” 5005, vol. 14, no. 4, pp. 176–183, Dec. 2024, DOI: 10.55493/5005.v14i4.5258.

B. Dash, P. Sharma, and S. Swayamsiddha, “Organizational Digital Transformations and the Importance of Assessing Theoretical Frameworks such as TAM, TTF, and UTAUT: A Review,” IJACSA, vol. 14, no. 2, 2023, DOI: 10.14569/ijacsa.2023.0140201.

Most read articles by the same author(s)

<< < 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 > >>