Accomplishments and Challenges: A Research Study for Software Defect Prediction

Main Article Content

Dr. Rajesh Prasad
Dr. Sunil Kadam
Prof. Vinayak Patil
Dr. Pramod Jadhav
Dr. Vinod Patil
Dr. Amol Kadam

Abstract

Investigation and prediction of defects in software is one of the important solutions to ensure software quality and reliability. Machine learning algorithms are used across a wide array of fields to solve real-world problems by building large, complex models. Many researchers have made significant contributions by developing predictive models for software defects using statistical and machine-learning approaches. But only a few frameworks have discussed the issue of building a universal software defect prediction model. Most existing models have been trained on limited datasets, which results in good performance on the training data but poor performance on unseen data. These limitations have motivated researchers to explore and develop more generalised and universal models for software defect prediction. Moreover, the growing complexity of contemporary software systems. Such limitations have encouraged researchers to investigate and build more generalised and universal models for software defect prediction. In addition, the increasing complexity of modern software systems and the rapid growth of software repositories have driven a demand for intelligent prediction techniques capable of handling heterogeneous data. Research is being conducted to investigate advanced machine learning and deep learning methods, including ensemble learning and transfer learning, to enhance prediction accuracy and adaptability across different software projects. These approaches aim to reduce development and maintenance costs and increase the overall reliability and performance of software products.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

Section

Articles

Author Biography

Dr. Vinod Patil, Associate Professor, Department of Electronics and Telecommunication, Bharati Vidyapeeth (Deemed to be University) College of Engineering, Pune (Maharashtra), India.



How to Cite

[1]
Dr. Rajesh Prasad, Dr. Sunil Kadam, Prof. Vinayak Patil, Dr. Pramod Jadhav, Dr. Vinod Patil, and Dr. Amol Kadam , Trans., “Accomplishments and Challenges: A Research Study for Software Defect Prediction”, IJITEE, vol. 15, no. 6, pp. 8–14, May 2026, doi: 10.35940/ijitee.F1274.15060526.
Share |

References

David Bowes, Tracy Hall, and Steve Counsell,

“Uncertainty in Software Defect Prediction,” Empirical Software Engineering, 2016. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10664-016-9431-3

URL: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10664-016-9431-3

H. Krasner, “Quality Software A 2018 Report,” Consort. IT Softw. Qual., 2018.

S. Kaliraj, V.G.P. Sahasranth, and V. Sivakumar, “A holistic approach to software fault prediction with dynamic classification,” Automated Software Engineering, 2024.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10515-024-00467-4

Xin Xia, David Lo, Sinno Jialin Pan, Nachiappan Nagappan, and Xinyu Wang, “HYDRA: Massively Compositional Model for Cross-Project Defect Prediction,” IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, Vol. 42, No. 10, pp. 977–998, 2016.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/TSE.2016.2543218

Seyedrebvar Hosseini and Burak Turhan, “A Comparison of Similarity-Based Instance Selection Methods for Cross-Project Defect Prediction,” 2021. URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2104.01024

Xin Xia, David Lo, Xin Wang, and Bo Zhou,

“Cross-Project Defect Prediction Using Transfer Learning Techniques,” IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, 2016.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/TSE.2016.2543218

URL: https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/7425176

Ankur Tagra, Haoxiang Zhang, Gopi Krishnan Rajbahadur, and Ahmed E. Hassan, “Revisiting Reopened Bugs in Open Source Software Systems,” arXiv preprint, 2022.

URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2202.08701

F. Zhang, Q. Zheng, Y. Zou, and A. E. Hassan, “Cross-Project Defect Prediction Using Context-Aware Rank Transformation,” Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Software Maintenance and Evolution (ICSME), 2016. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/ICSME.2016

URL: https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/

Santosh Singh Rathore, S. Kumar, and V. Singh,

“Ensemble Learning-Based Software Fault Prediction Using Hybrid Classifiers,” Neural Computing and Applications, 2019–2021, related studies. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-019-04386-8

URL: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00521-019-04386-8

Santosh Singh Rathore, S. Kumar, and V. Singh,

“Hybrid and Ensemble-Based Machine Learning Approaches for Software Fault Prediction,” Neural Computing and Applications, 2019–2021. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-019-04386-8

URL: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00521-019-04386-8

Lina Gong, Xiaobing Sun, and Zhenyu Chen,

“Addressing Class Imbalance in Cross-Project Defect Prediction Using Stratified Nearest Neighbour,” Information and Software Technology, Vol. 75, pp. 80–94, 2016. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infsof.2016.02.001 URL: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0950584916300198

Misbah Ali, Tehseen Mazhar, Tariq Shahzad, et al., “Analysis of Feature Selection Methods in Software Defect Prediction Models,” IEEE Access, Vol. 11, pp. 145954–145974, 2023. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2023.3343249

URL: https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/10323200

Somya R. Goyal, “A Systematic Review on AI-Based Class Imbalance Handling in Software Defect Prediction,” Results in Engineering, Vol. 27, 2025. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rineng.2025.106578 URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rineng.2025.106578

Xinghuo Chen, David Lo, and Xin Xia, “Interpretable Software Defect Prediction Models: A Systematic Literature Review,” Information and Software Technology, 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infsof.2020.106371

URL: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S095058492030126X

Ahmed E. Hassan, David Lo, and Xin Xia, “Software Analytics: The Role of Data Quality in Software Defect Prediction,” IEEE Software, Vol. 35, No. 6, pp. 84–90, 2018. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/MS.2018.2875983 URL: https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/8453143

Most read articles by the same author(s)

<< < 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 > >>