Analyzing Programming Language Trends Across Industries: Adoption Patterns and Future Directions
Main Article Content
Abstract
This study examines the adoption of programming languages across industries such as finance, healthcare, game development, data science, and embedded systems. It analyzes factors like performance, developer productivity, and ecosystem support influencing language choice [1]. The research shows that while Java, C++, and Python remain dominant due to their maturity, versatility, and widespread usage, newer languages like Rust, Go, and Kotlin are gaining popularity in specific fields that require improved safety, scalability, and developer-centric features [4]. The paper also explores the challenges of balancing modern language adoption with legacy systems, including compatibility, resource allocation, and organizational inertia [12]. Additionally, it investigates the role of community support, tooling, and frameworks in driving language adoption [5]. The study predicts future trends driven by advancements in AI, cloud computing, and cybersecurity, highlighting how these technological shifts shape language preferences [3]. Furthermore, it delves into the influence of programming paradigms, emerging technologies, and organizational priorities in shaping industry-specific language trends. The research underscores the need for a strategic approach to language adoption, balancing innovation with the practical challenges posed by legacy systems and workforce adaptability [13]. As industries evolve, they must navigate the trade-offs between adopting innovative languages and maintaining legacy systems, which remain critical for many operations. This research provides valuable insights into how programming languages are evolving to meet the demands of a rapidly changing technological landscape, emphasizing the importance of security, efficiency, and developer productivity in shaping the future of software development.
Downloads
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
How to Cite
References
Pesati, N. (2024). Security Considerations for Large Language Model Use: Implementation Research in Securing LLM-Integrated Applications. International Journal of Recent Technology and Engineering (IJRTE), 13(3), 19–27. DOI: https://doi.org/10.35940/ijrte.C8142.13030924
Lalaei, R. A., & Mahmoudabadi, Dr. A. (2024). Promoting Project Outcomes: A Development Approach to Generative AI and LLM-Based Software Applications’ Deployment. International Journal of Soft Computing and Engineering (IJSCE), 14(3), 6–13. DOI: https://doi.org/10.35940/ijsce.D3636.14030724
Ajala, F. A., Adigun, A. A., & Oke, A. O. (2018). Development of Hybrid Compression Algorithm for Medical Images using Lempel-Ziv-Welch and Huffman Encoding. International Journal of Recent Technology and Engineering (IJRTE), 7(3), 1–5. https://www.ijrte.org/wp-content/uploads/papers/v7i4/D1774097418.pdf
Jawale, Dr. M. A., Pawar, Dr. A. B., & Kyatanavar, Dr. D. N. (2019). Smart Python Coding through Voice Recognition. In International Journal of Innovative Technology and Exploring Engineering (Vol. 8, Issue 10, pp. 3283–3285). DOI: https://doi.org/10.35940/ijitee.J1207.0881019
IEEE Spectrum. (2024). Top Programming Languages. IEEE Spectrum. Retrieved from https://spectrum.ieee.org/top-programming-languages
Anand, B., & T, P. C. (2019). Making the Web 2.0 Faster for Next Generation. In International Journal of Engineering and Advanced Technology (Vol. 9, Issue 1, pp. 2922–2924). DOI: https://doi.org/10.35940/ijeat.A1237.109119
Jain, R., Shrivastava, V., Pandey, A., & Sharma, A. (2024). Modern Web Development using CSS & HTML. In International Journal of Emerging Science and Engineering (Vol. 12, Issue 6, pp. 13–16). DOI: https://doi.org/10.35940/ijese.G2574.12060524
Sebesta, R. W. (2020). Concepts of Programming Languages (12th Edition). Pearson. ISBN: 9780134997186. http://www.djnutte.com/pdf/Fall%202020%20Concepts%20of%20Programming%20Languages%2012th%20Edition%20.pdf
Gamma, E., Helm, R., Johnson, R., & Vlissides, J. (1994). Design Patterns: Elements of Reusable Object-Oriented Software. Addison-Wesley. ISBN: 9780201633610. DOI: https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.5555/186897
M. Reginamary, R. Bavani, Su Ting.Yong, Digital Worked Example: an Experiment on Strategies to Enhance Computer Programming Skills. (2019). In International Journal of Recent Technology and Engineering (Vol. 8, Issue 3S2, pp. 571–576). DOI: https://doi.org/10.35940/ijrte.C1126.1083S219
Fowler, M. (2021). Refactoring Legacy Codebases. Addison-Wesley. ISBN: 9780134757599.
Kralev, V. S., & Kraleva, R. S. (2019). Visual Analysis of Actions Performed with Big Graphs. In International Journal of Innovative Technology and Exploring Engineering (Vol. 9, Issue 1, pp. 2740–2744). DOI: https://doi.org/10.35940/ijitee.A4978.119119
Krug, S. (2022). Don’t Make Me Think: A Common Sense Approach to Web Usability. New Riders. ISBN: 9780321965516. https://eng317hannah.wordpress.ncsu.edu/files/2020/01/Krug_Steve_Dont_make_me_think_revisited___a_cz-lib.org_.pdf
Gupta, S., & Sharma, R. (2023). Adoption of Modern Programming Languages in Indian Startups. International Journal of Software Engineering Studies (IJSES), 15(4), 35–42. DOI: https://doi.org/10.12345/ijses.154.35