A Support Program for First-Year University Biology That Improves Course Performance Among At-Risk Students
Main Article Content
Abstract
First-year students often struggle with the transition to university learning, which can lead to lower grades, higher dropout rates, and poorer overall well-being. We evaluated a low cost, scalable program to support students at academic risk in an introductory biology course at Western University (London, Ontario, Canada). Each fall (September–December), the Department of Biology offers Biology 1001A, the first half of a foundational first-year course. More than 2,000 students enrol annually. The course is a prerequisite for progression to second year classes in biology, medical sciences, and health sciences. At risk students identified by poor midterm exam performance were offered four weekly, one-hour sessions that provided tutoring, test taking strategies, and mental health support from upper-year student mentors and a faculty instructor. Attendance was encouraged but optional. The three-hour final exam consisted of 45 multiple-choice and five short-answer questions. Grade improvement (%) was calculated as the final exam grade (%) - midterm exam grade (%). We found that attendees improved from the midterm to final exam by 5.3 percentage points more than non attendees (95% CI 3.5 to 7.1; p < 0.001). Attendees also reported greater satisfaction with their final exam performance, fewer personal concerns and stronger perceived support from the instructional team. From midterm to final, attendees also reported greater familiarity with multiple-choice testing, lower test-taking anxiety, and fewer concerns about insufficient study time. These findings suggest that targeted support to at-risk students in a large class can improve both academic outcomes and the student experience. In future communication materials for this support program, we will share that attendees demonstrated improved academic performance, which may encourage greater participation.
Downloads
Article Details
Section

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
How to Cite
References
Google AN, Gardner GE, Grinath AS. Undergraduate students’ approaches to learning biology: a systematic review of the literature. Studies in Science Education. 2023;59(1):25-66.
https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/03057267.2021.2004005
Aina C, Baici E, Casalone G, Pastore F. The determinants of university dropout: a review of the socio-economic literature. Socio-Economic Planning Sciences. 2022; 79:101102.
https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/soceps/v79y2022ics003801212100094x.html
Tracy CB, Driessen EP, Beatty AE, Lamb T, Pruett JE, Botello JD, Brittain C, Ford ÍC, Josefson CC, Klabacka RL, Smith T, Steele A, Zhong M, Bowling S, Dixon L, Ballen CJ. Why students struggle in undergraduate biology: sources and solutions. CBE—Life Sciences Education. 2022;21(3):ar48.
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35759627/
Thompson ME. Grade expectations: the role of first-year grades in predicting the pursuit of STEM majors for first- and continuing-generation students. The Journal of Higher Education. 2021;92(6):961-985. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/00221546.2021.1907169
Weatherton M, Schussler EE, Brigati JR, Ferguson H, Boyd I, England BJ. Is support in the anxiety of the beholder? How anxiety interacts with perceptions of instructor support in introductory biology classes. CBE—Life Sciences Education. 2024;23(4):ar45. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.24-02-0092.
National Science Board, National Science Foundation. STEM talent: education, training, and workforce. Science and Engineering Indicators 2026 (NSB-2026-1). Alexandria, VA: National Science Foundation; 2026. https://ncses.nsf.gov/pubs/nsb20261/introduction
U.S. Bureau of Labour Statistics. Employment in STEM occupations. U.S. Department of Labour. Available from:
https://www.bls.gov/emp/tables/stem-employment.htm. Accessed April 4, 2026.
University of Toronto, Faculty of Arts & Science. Academic standing. Available from: https://www.artsci.utoronto.ca/current/faculty-registrar/academic-standing. Accessed April 4, 2026.
Linden B, Stuart H, Ecclestone A. Trends in post-secondary student stress: a Pan-Canadian study. Canadian Journal of Psychiatry. 2023; 68(7):521-530. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35791667/
Simón-Grábalos D, Fonseca D, Aláez M, Romero-Yesa S, Fresneda-Portillo C. Systematic review of the literature on interventions to improve self-regulation of learning in first-year university students. Education Sciences. 2025; 15(3):372.
https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7102/15/3/372
Batz Z, Olsen BJ, Dumont J, Dastoor F, Smith MK. Helping struggling students in introductory biology: a peer-tutoring approach that improves performance, perception, and retention. CBE—Life Sciences Education. 2015;14(2):ar16. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.14-08-0120.
Wilton M, Katz D, Clairmont A, Gonzalez-Nino E, Foltz KR, Christoffersen RE. Improving academic performance and retention of first-year biology students through a scalable peer mentorship program. CBE—Life Sciences Education. 2021;20(4): ar63.DOI: https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.21-02-0039.
Gehreke L, Schilling H, Kauffeld S. Effectiveness of peer mentoring in the study entry phase: a systematic review. Review of Education. 2024;12(1): e3462. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/rev3.3462.
Aucejo EM, Wong K. The effect of feedback on student performance. Journal of Public Economics. 2025; 241:105274.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpubeco.2024.105274.
Loes CN, An BP, Trolian TL. Quality of student-faculty interactions, persistence, and the mediating role of student satisfaction. Journal of Postsecondary Student Success. 2024;3(4). DOI: https://doi.org/10.33009/fsop_jpss134793.
Campbell AL, Mogashana D. Assessing the effectiveness of academic coaching interventions for student success in higher education: a systematic review. Innovations in Education and Teaching International. 2025;62(4):1325-1347. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2024.2417173.
Ménard AD, Jaffri S, Soucie K, Cavallo-Medved D, Houser C. Awareness, use, and value of student support programs through the lens of science students, professors, and staff. The Canadian Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning. 2024;15(2): Article 11. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5206/cjsotlrcacea.2024.2.14211.