EEG-based Imagined Speech Analysis using Functional Connectivity

Main Article Content

Dr. Meenakshi Bisla
Dr. Radhey Shyam Anand

Abstract

Imagined speech involves a network of brain regions that simulate the experience of speaking or listening, though it lacks the physical movement of the vocal apparatus or external sound. This study analyses the brain's role in the imagination of words, sentences, and vowels using an amalgamation of innovative methods, including transfer entropy, graph theory, and functional connectivity. Channels that exhibit stronger connectivity than most of the network play a crucial role in information processing or network integration. This helps analyze the most "active" or "influential" channels of imagination of any class. By selecting channels with connectivity values significantly above the average (i.e., those exceeding the mean + 1.5 standard deviations), this method ensures that you focus on the most distinctive and potentially relevant patterns in the data. The analysis is performed on the original EEG dataset acquired. The proposed analysis is also validated using public datasets (Kara one and ASU) to assess the reliability of the methodology. Overall, the findings support the hypothesis that imagined speech engages a distributed but left leaning network of regions, with task-specific patterns modulated by the complexity and phonetic structure of the stimuli.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

Section

Articles

How to Cite

[1]
Dr. Meenakshi Bisla and Dr. Radhey Shyam Anand, “EEG-based Imagined Speech Analysis using Functional Connectivity”, IJSCE, vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 22–28, Mar. 2026, doi: 10.35940/ijsce.A3711.16010326.

References

M. Wang, J. Hu, and H. A. Abbass, “BrainPrint: EEG biometric identification based on analysing brain connectivity graphs,” Pattern Recognit., vol. 105, p. 107381, Sep. 2020, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.patcog.2020.107381

S.-H. Lee, M. Lee, and S.-W. Lee, “Neural Decoding of Imagined Speech and Visual Imagery as Intuitive Paradigms for BCI Communication,” IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering, vol. 28, no. 12, pp. 2647–2659, Dec. 2020, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/TNSRE.2020.3040289

M. A. Bakhshali, M. Khademi, and A. Ebrahimi-Moghadam, “Investigating the neural correlates of imagined speech: An EEG-based connectivity analysis,” Digit. Signal Process., vol. 123, p. 103435, Apr. 2022, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dsp.2022.103435

R. Abiri, S. Borhani, E. W. Sellers, Y. Jiang, and X. Zhao, “A comprehensive review of EEG-based brain–computer interface paradigms,” J. Neural Eng., vol. 16, no. 1, p. 011001, Feb. 2019, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/1741-2552/aaf12e

R. Anandha Sree, B. Divya, and A. Kavitha, “Task-specific Brain Synchronisation in EEG-based Speech and Speech Imagery Procedures,” J. Phys. Conf. Ser., vol. 1937, no. 1, p. 012044, Jun. 2021, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1937/1/012044

X. Pei, D. L. Barbour, E. C. Leuthardt, and G. Schalk, “Decoding vowels and consonants in spoken and imagined words using electrocorticographic signals in humans,” J. Neural Eng., vol. 8, no. 4, p. 046028, Aug. 2011,

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/10.1088/1741-2560/8/4/046028, works remain significant, see the declaration

J. S. Brumberg et al., “Spatio-Temporal Progression of Cortical Activity Related to Continuous Overt and Covert Speech Production in a Reading Task,” PLoS One, vol. 11, no. 11, p. e0166872, Nov. 2016,DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0166872

R. Vicente, M. Wibral, M. Lindner, and G. Pipa, “Transfer entropy—a model-free measure of effective connectivity for the neurosciences,” J. Comput. Neurosci., vol. 30, no. 1, pp. 45–67, Feb. 2011, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10827-010-0262-3, works remain significant, see the declaration

H. Huang, M. Fan, and C.-A. Chou, “Graph-based learning of nonlinear physiological interactions for classification of emotions,” Pattern Recognit., vol. 143, p. 109794, Nov. 2023, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.patcog.2023.109794

M. Bisla and R. Shyam Anand, “Transfer Learning Enabled Imagined Speech Interpretation Using Phase-Based Brain Functional Connectivity and Power Analysis,” IEEE Access, vol. 12, pp. 108399–108413, 2024, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2024.3438873

M. Bisla and R. S. Anand, “Analysis of Imagined Speech Characteristics using Phase-based Connectivity Measures,” in Proceedings - 13th IEEE International Conference on Control Systems, Computing and Engineering, ICCSCE 2023, 2023. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/ICCSCE58721.2023.10237139

I. Daly, S. J. Nasuto, and K. Warwick, “Brain computer interface control via functional connectivity dynamics,” Pattern Recognit., vol. 45, no. 6, pp. 2123–2136, Jun. 2012, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.patcog.2011.04.034, works remain significant, see the declaration

R.S. Anand, Meenakshi Bisla, Anand Mohan, and Dilnawaz, “A Multi-Class Electroencephalography Dataset for Imagined Speech Decoding,” Jan. 25, 2026, IEEE Dataport. DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.21227/2ybw-rt36

S. Zhao and F. Rudzicz, “Classifying phonological categories in imagined and articulated speech,” in 2015 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP), IEEE, Apr. 2015, pp. 992–996. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/ICASSP.2015.7178118, works remain significant, see the declaration

C. H. Nguyen, G. K. Karavas, and P. Artemiadis, “Inferring imagined speech using EEG signals: a new approach using Riemannian manifold features,” J. Neural Eng., vol. 15, no. 1, p. 016002, Feb. 2018, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/1741-2552/aa8235

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 > >>