Artificial Intelligence, University Education, and the End of the Biological Brain: An Examination of a Singularity

Main Article Content

Dr. Ayouba LAWANI

Abstract

This article critically examines the sustainability and limits of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in higher education, as well as ways to preserve students' intellectual integrity and cognitive diversity. It explores the possibility of transitioning to education systems based on advanced technologies. It highlights the inevitable risks of relentlessly pursuing new frontiers in higher education, including loss of creativity and increasing dependence on AI for knowledge transmission and skill development. This could potentially diminish the importance of human capacity for critical thinking, analysis, and problem-solving. The research method includes a literature review and qualitative approaches such as case studies, semi-structured interviews, and scenariobased simulations. The notion of integrating AI into higher education to enhance human intelligence warrants close examination. These identified risks caution against its adoption as a tool for enhancing skills in university education. It is wiser to conduct research now to anticipate, clarify, and ideally prevent the speculative risks that introducing this intelligence into higher education may pose. Simple solutions, coupled with flexible and rational strategies to address these risks, should help ensure that AI's technological singularity does not mark the end of biological evolution.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

Section

Articles

How to Cite

[1]
Dr. Ayouba LAWANI , Tran., “Artificial Intelligence, University Education, and the End of the Biological Brain: An Examination of a Singularity”, IJRTE, vol. 15, no. 3, pp. 12–19, Sep. 2026, doi: 10.35940/ijrte.D8172.13041124.
Share |

References

Jin G, Ni X, Wei K, Zhao J, Zhang H, Jia L. Will the technological singularity come soon? Modelling the dynamics of artificial intelligence development via multi-logistic growth process. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications. 2025; 664:130450. DOI: 10.1016/j.physa.2025.130450.

Hottois G. Philosophie et idéologies trans/posthumanistes. Paris: Vrin; 2017. URL : Librairie philosophique J. Vrin - ouvrage. https://www.vrin.fr/livre/9782711627851/philosophie-et-ideologies-transposthumanistes

Bohan E. AI and the Technological Singularity: A History of a Big Idea and Why It Matters. In: The De Gruyter Handbook of Artificial Intelligence, Identity and.... Berlin/Boston: De Gruyter; 2024:287. DOI: 10.1515/9783110721751.

Farkaš I. Transforming Cognition and Human Society in the Digital Age. Biological Theory. 2024. DOI: 10.1007/s13752-024-00483-3.

Ishizaki R, Sugiyama M. Large language models: assessment for singularity. AI & Society. 2025; 40:5481-5491.

DOI: 10.1007/s00146-025-02271-4.

Persoon PGJ, Bekkers RNA, Alkemade F. How cumulative is technological knowledge? Quantitative Science Studies. 2021; 2(3):1092-1118. DOI: 10.1162/qss_a_00140.

Bluet A, Osiurak F, Reynaud E. Innovation rate and population structure moderate the effect of population size on cumulative technological culture. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications. 2024; 11:649. DOI: 10.1057/s41599-024-03157-4.

Computer History Museum. Fei-Fei Li Talks AI. 2024. Available from: https://computerhistory.org/blog/fei-fei-li-talks-ai/

Yavich R. Will the Use of AI Undermine Students' Independent Thinking? Education Sciences. 2025; 15(6):669.

DOI: 10.3390/educsci15060669.

Guo W, Liang Z, Wang C, Li X, Hu H, Chen S, Yu Q, Zhao Q. Student-AI collaborative creative problem-solving: The role of human agency. Computers & Education. 2025; 239:105433. DOI: 10.1016/j.compedu.2025.105433.

Haroud S, Saqri N. Generative AI in Higher Education: Teachers’ and Students’ Perspectives on Support, Replacement, and Digital Literacy. Education Sciences. 2025;15(4):396. DOI: 10.3390/educsci15040396.

Ishizaki R, Sugiyama M. Large language models: assessment for singularity. AI & Society. 2025 ;40:5481-5491.

DOI: 10.1007/s00146-025-02271-4.

Jin G, Ni X, Wei K, Zhao J, Zhang H, Jia L. Will the technological singularity come soon? Modelling the dynamics of artificial intelligence development via multi-logistic growth process. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications. 2025; 664:130450.

DOI: 10.1016/j.physa.2025.130450.

Thorstad D. Against the singularity hypothesis. Philosophical Studies. 2025;182(7):1627-1651. DOI: 10.1007/s11098-024-02143-5.

Tian J, Zhang R. Learners' AI dependence and critical thinking: The psychological mechanism of fatigue and the social buffering role of AI literacy. Acta Psychologica. 2025; 260:105725. DOI: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2025.105725.

Hou C, Zhu G. The role of critical thinking on undergraduates' reliance behaviours on generative AI in problem-solving. British Journal of Educational Technology. 2025. DOI: 10.1111/bjet.13613.

Klingbeil A, Grützner C, Schreck P. Trust and reliance on AI: An experimental study on the extent and costs of overreliance on AI. Computers in Human Behaviour. 2024; 160:108352. DOI: 10.1016/j.chb.2024.108352.

Artificial intelligence is not a substitute for human intelligence. Nature Reviews Psychology. 2025; 4:753-754.

DOI: 10.1038/s44159-025-00517-y.

Lepage A, Collin S. Preserving Teacher and Student Agency: Insights from a Literature Review. In: Urmeneta A, Romero M, editors. Creative Applications of Artificial Intelligence in Education. Palgrave Studies in Creativity and Culture. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan; 2024:17-34. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-031-55272-4_2

Nature. Anticipating artificial intelligence. 2016; 532(7600): 413-413 (ISSN 1476-4687, DOI: 10.1038/532413a, consulted on June 20 2024).

Elsner M. The state as a model for AI control and alignment. AI & Society. 2025; 40:2983-2993. DOI: 10.1007/s00146-024-02063-2.

McKay D. Olympians: humanity as a solution to the control problem for artificial superintelligence. AI and Ethics. 2025; 5:4049-4059.

DOI: 10.1007/s43681-025-00712-w.

Tanchuk NJ. Deep ASI Literacy: Educating for Alignment with Artificial Super Intelligent Systems. Educational Theory. 2025.

DOI: 10.1111/edth.70030.

Dung L. The argument for near-term human disempowerment through AI. AI & Society. 2025; 40:1195-1208.

DOI: 10.1007/s00146-024-01930-2.

www.lesnumeriques.com

Bengio Y, Mindermann S, Privitera D, et al. International AI Safety Report 2025. 2025.

https://internationalaisafetyreport.org/publication/international-ai-safety-report-2025

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 > >>