Does Bulk Buying Save Money or Increase Spending? A Qualitative Exploration of Consumer Perceptions and Behaviours

Main Article Content

Abhyuday Shashi

Abstract

Buying in bulk has become a common shopping practice, with consumers often viewing larger purchases as a way to reduce costs over time. Despite this assumption, it remains unclear whether bulk purchasing consistently reduces household spending. This study examined how individuals decide whether to buy in bulk and howthose decisionsinfluence household spending patterns. We conducted semi-structured interviews with 18 participants representing different household situations. The interviews revealed several common experiences. While most participants believed purchasing larger quantities helped them save money, many also described situations in which bulk purchases led to unplanned spending or faster-than-intended consumption. Participants also discussed product waste, particularly when items expired before they could be fully consumed. Family size, available storage space, and everyday shopping habits were important factors in determining whether bulk buying was beneficial. Overall, the findings suggest that bulk purchasing can provide financial benefits, but those benefits are not guaranteed and depend largely on household circumstances and consumer behaviour. The results highlight the complexity of consumer purchasing decisions and suggest opportunities for further study of spending behaviours in different household settings.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

Section

Articles

How to Cite

[1]
Abhyuday Shashi , Tran., “Does Bulk Buying Save Money or Increase Spending? A Qualitative Exploration of Consumer Perceptions and Behaviours”, IJMH, vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 25–31, Sep. 2026, doi: 10.35940/ijmh.B1905.13021026.
Share |

References

Sharma, E., & Alter, A. L. (2012). Financial deprivation prompts consumers to seek scarce goods. Journal of Consumer Research, 39(3), 545-560. DOI: 10.1086/664038. Works remain significant; see the declaration

Chandon, P., & Wansink, B. (2002). When are stockpiled products consumed faster? A convenience-salience framework of postpurchase consumption incidence and quantity. Journal of Marketing Research, 39(3), 321-335. DOI: 10.1509/jmkr.39.3.321.19111. Works remain significant; see the declaration

Priolo, G., Stablum, F., Vacondio, M., D'Ambrogio, S., Caserotti, M., Conte, B., De Roni, P., Grillo, V. D., Mastromatteo, L. Y., et al. (2026). The robustness of mental accounting across 21 countries. Journal of Consumer Research. Advance online publication. DOI: 10.1093/jcr/ucag022

Griffith, R., Leibtag, E., Leicester, A., & Nevo, A. (2009). Consumer shopping behaviour: How much do consumers save? Journal of Economic Perspectives, 23(2), 99-120. DOI: 10.1257/jep.23.2.99. Works remain significant; see the declaration

Porpino, G., Parente, J., & Wansink, B. (2015). Food waste paradox: Antecedents of food disposal in low-income households. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 39(6), 619-629. DOI: 10.1111/ijcs.12207. Works remain significant; see the declaration

Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (4th ed.). Sage. https://www.scirp.org/reference/referencespapers?referenceid=2155979

Guest, G., Bunce, A., & Johnson, L. (2006). How many interviews are enough? An experiment with data saturation and variability. Field Methods, 18(1), 59-82. DOI: 10.1177/1525822X05279903. Works remain significant; see the declaration

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77-101.

DOI: 10.1191/1478088706qp063oa, Works remain significant; see the declaration

Most read articles by the same author(s)

<< < 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 > >>