Selection of Alternative Working Methods using the Crashing and Microsoft Project Methods

Main Article Content

Muhammad Djuneydi
Yudi Setio Prabowo
M. Oka Mahendra

Abstract

In carrying out the PPLP Banten Building construction project, it experienced delays. The causes of delays are the addition of time, changes in shop drawings and material delays. Then the solution in theMicrosoft project is an alternative crashing method of 4 hours of overtime and work shifts. The research results obtained 18 jobs that are on the critical path of 43 jobs. The normal total duration is 942 days and the normal fee is Rp. 569.100.000 using AHSP. The results obtained are the total duration of the alternative crashing 4 hours of overtime work is 678 days, while the work shift is 530 days, the AHSP Project produces an alternative total cost of 4 hours overtime of Rp. 3.066.675.000 and work shifts with accident costs of Rp. 1.223.565.000. The alternative cost of 4 hours of overtime using the AHSP project is Rp. 193.067.245,23 and work shifts using the AHSP project of Rp. 33.638.199,58 then the work shift alternative is more economical and was chosen to be applied to the project. The results of the comparison of direct and indirect costs for the 4-hour overtime alternative are direct costs Rp. 9.672.161.032,2 indirect costs Rp. 1.322.728.805,77 and direct costs for work shift alternatives Rp.9.512.731.986,58 costs Rp. 1.273.456.116,78 then the work shift alternative is more economical and is chosen to be applied to the project.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
[1]
Muhammad Djuneydi, Yudi Setio Prabowo, and M. Oka Mahendra , Trans., “Selection of Alternative Working Methods using the Crashing and Microsoft Project Methods”, IJEAT, vol. 12, no. 5, pp. 127–139, Jun. 2023, doi: 10.35940/ijeat.E4130.0612523.
Section
Articles

How to Cite

[1]
Muhammad Djuneydi, Yudi Setio Prabowo, and M. Oka Mahendra , Trans., “Selection of Alternative Working Methods using the Crashing and Microsoft Project Methods”, IJEAT, vol. 12, no. 5, pp. 127–139, Jun. 2023, doi: 10.35940/ijeat.E4130.0612523.
Share |

References

Ridwan, “Analisis Percepatan Proyek Menggunakan Metode Crashing Dengan Penambahan Jam Kerja Empat Jam dan Sistem Shift Kerja (Studi Kasus : Proyek Pembangunan Gedung RSUB Malang),” J. Apl. Pelayaran Dan Kepelabuhanan, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 35–53, 2020, doi: 10.30649/japk.v11i1.61.

A. S. Leangso and F. Nugraheni, “Pengaruh Kerja Lembur Terhadap Produktivitas Tenaga Kerja Konstruksi pada Pekerjaan Balok dan Plat Lantai (Studi Kasus Proyek Pembangunan Parsley Bakery & Resto Jalan Laksda Adisutjipto Yogyakarta),” Dsp. Univ. Islam Indones., 2018, [Online]. Available: https://dspace.uii.ac.id/handle/123456789/11322%0Ahttps://dspace.uii.ac.id/bitstream/handle/123456789/11322/08 naskah publikasi.pdf?sequence=16&isAllowed=y

KEMENPERIN, “Undang - Undang RI No 13 tahun 2003,” Ketenagakerjaan, no. 1, 2003.

A. T. P. Nandiwardhana, T. H. Nainggolan, and T. Iskandar, “GRESIK DENGAN METODE FAST TRACK”.

R. A. Sumarna, “Holding Bumn Terhadap Kinerja Keuangan Bumn,” Direktorat Jenderal Anggaran, Kementeri. Keuang., vol. 2, no. 1, p. 246, 2018.

Satriono and A. Sigit, “Optimalisasi Biaya Dan Waktu Proyek Menggunakan Metode Crashing Dengan Penambahan Waktu Kerja (Lembur) Dan Sistem Kerja Shift (Studi kasus : Proyek Pembangunan dan Pengembangan RSUD Tipe B Kabupaten Magelang),” Tek. Sipil, Univ. Islam Indones., vol. 53, no. 9, pp. 1689–1699, 2013.

“PERGUB BANten 35 2021.pdf.”

T. T. Nuhuyanan and T. Sumarningsih, “Percepatan proyek pembangunan pengadilan negeri wonosari dengan metode shift kerja,” J. Ilm. Tek. Sipil, pp. 1–10, 2018.

Most read articles by the same author(s)

<< < 3 4 5 6 7 8