Artificial Intelligence and the Future of Sustainable Economic Growth: Implications for Productivity, Employment, Innovation, Inequality, and Inclusive Development

Main Article Content

Somto Emmanuel Ilomuanya
Micheal Abimbola Oladosu
Taiwo Olayode Mustapha
Moses Adondua Abah

Abstract

Artificial intelligence (AI) is being touted as a catchall, ‘general-purpose technology' which can transform economic growth. AI, or ‘artificial intelligence ', is emerging as a ‘catch-all' or ‘general-purpose technology' with the capacity to drive economic growth. The effects on productivity, jobs, innovation, inequality, and sustainability have been debated. The objective of this review is to bring together the peer-reviewed and working paper literature relating to the subject during the period 2020– 2025. Experimental and firm-level studies indicate significant task-level productivity improvements, particularly for less experienced workers. In macroeconomics, estimates of aggregate gains do not exceed. As for employment, so far it is not mass displacement; rather, it is task reallocation, which, as is well known, occurs with automation and leads to wage polarisation. AI is creating innovations in science and biomedicine like protein structure prediction and drug discovery, but few companies and countries can develop AI. AI can help achieve climate and Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), but it also has significant energy, carbon, and water impacts. We believe AI-powered growth is sustainable and inclusive only if complemented by appropriate investments in skills, governance, auditing, open infrastructure, and energy-efficient computing. We recommend a policy framework and research priorities.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

Section

Articles

How to Cite

[1]
Somto Emmanuel Ilomuanya, Micheal Abimbola Oladosu, Taiwo Olayode Mustapha, and Moses Adondua Abah, “Artificial Intelligence and the Future of Sustainable Economic Growth: Implications for Productivity, Employment, Innovation, Inequality, and Inclusive Development”, IJSCE, vol. 16, no. 4, pp. 22–28, Sep. 2026, doi: 10.35940/ijsce.E3728.16051126.

References

Maslej N, Fattorini L, Perrault R, Parli V, Reuel A, Brynjolfsson E, et al. The AI Index 2024 Annual Report. arXiv:2405.19522. 2024.

DOI: 10.48550/arXiv.2405.19522

Bommasani R, Hudson DA, Adeli E, Altman R, Arora S, von Arx S, et al. On the opportunities and risks of foundation models. arXiv:2108.07258. 2021. DOI: 10.48550/arXiv.2108.07258

Eloundou T, Manning S, Mishkin P, Rock D. GPTs are GPTs: labour market impact potential of LLMs. Science. 2024;384(6702):1306-8. DOI: 10.1126/science.adj0998

Vinuesa R, Azizpour H, Leite I, Balaam M, Dignum V, Domisch S, et al. The role of artificial intelligence in achieving the Sustainable Development Goals. Nat Commun. 2020; 11:233. DOI: 10.1038/s41467-019-14108-y

Tomašev N, Cornebise J, Hutter F, Mohamed S, Picciariello A, Connelly B, et al. AI for social good: unlocking the opportunity for positive impact. Nat Commun. 2020; 11:2468. DOI: 10.1038/s41467-020-15871-z

Noy S, Zhang W. Experimental evidence on the productivity effects of generative artificial intelligence. Science. 2023;381(6654):187-92.

DOI: 10.1126/science.adh2586

Brynjolfsson E, Li D, Raymond LR. Generative AI at work. Q J Econ. 2025;140(2):889-942. DOI: 10.1093/qje/qjae044

Peng S, Kalliamvakou E, Cihon P, Demirer M. The impact of AI on developer productivity: evidence from GitHub Copilot. arXiv:2302.06590. 2023. DOI: 10.48550/arXiv.2302.06590

Korinek A. Generative AI for economic research: use cases and implications for economists. J Econ Lit. 2023;61(4):1281-317.

DOI: 10.1257 /10.1257 /jel6

Damioli G, Van Roy V, Vertesy D. The impact of artificial intelligence on labour productivity. Eurasian Bus Rev. 2021; 11:1-25.

DOI: 10.1007/s40821-020-00172-8

Acemoglu D. The simple macroeconomics of AI. Econ Policy. 2025;40(121):13-58. DOI: 10.1093/epolic/eiae042

Brynjolfsson E, Rock D, Syverson C. The productivity J-curve: how intangibles complement general purpose technologies. Am Econ J Macroecon. 2021;13(1):333-72. DOI: 10.1257/mac.20180386

Acemoglu D, Restrepo P. Robots and jobs: evidence from US labour markets. J Polit Econ. 2020;128(6):2188-244. DOI: 10.1086/705716

Acemoglu D, Autor D, Hazell J, Restrepo P. Artificial intelligence and jobs: evidence from online vacancies. J Labour Econ. 2022;40(S1): S293-340. DOI: 10.1086/718327

Babina T, Fedyk A, He A, Hodson J. Artificial intelligence, firm growth, and product innovation. J Financ Econ. 2024; 151:103745.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jfineco.2023.103745

Autor D. Applying AI to rebuild middle-class jobs. NBER Working Paper 32140. 2024. DOI: 10.3386/w32140

Jumper J, Evans R, Pritzel A, Green T, Figurnov M, Ronneberger O, et al. Highly accurate protein structure prediction with AlphaFold. Nature. 2021; 596:583-9. DOI: 10.1038/s41586-021-03819-2

Stokes JM, Yang K, Swanson K, Jin W, Cubillos-Ruiz A, Donghia NM, et al. A deep learning approach to antibiotic discovery. Cell. 2020;180(4):688-702.e13. DOI: 10.1016/j.cell.2020.01.021

Paul D, Sanap G, Shenoy S, Kalyane D, Kalia K, Tekade RK. Artificial intelligence in drug discovery and development. Drug Discov Today. 2021;26(1):80-93. DOI: 10.1016/j.drudis.2020.10.010

Jayatunga MKP, Ayers M, Bruens L, Jayanth D, Meier C. How successful are AI-discovered drugs in clinical trials? A first analysis and emerging lessons. Drug Discov Today. 2024;29(6):104009. DOI: 10.1016/j.drudis.2024.104009

Ahmed N, Wahed M, Thompson NC. The growing influence of industry in AI research. Science. 2023;379(6635):884-6. DOI: 10.1126/science.ade2420

Acemoglu D, Restrepo P. Tasks, automation, and the rise in US wage inequality. Econometrica. 2022;90(5):1973-2016. DOI: 10.3982/ECTA19815

Bender EM, Gebru T, McMillan-Major A, Shmitchell S. On the dangers of stochastic parrots: can language models be too big? In: Proceedings of the 2021 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency (FAccT '21). New York: ACM; 2021. p. 610- 23.

DOI: 1610- 23/3442188.3445922

Mökander J, Schuett J, Kirk HR, Floridi L. Auditing large language models: a three-layered approach. AI Ethics. 2024; 4:1085-115.

DOI: 10.1007/s43681-023-00289-2

Rolnick D, Donti PL, Kaack LH, Kochanski K, Lacoste A, Sankaran K, et al. Tackling climate change with machine learning. ACM Comput Surv. 2022;55(2):42. DOI: 10.1145/3485128

Patterson D, Gonzalez J, Hölzle U, Le Q, Liang C, Munguia LM, et al. The carbon footprint of machine learning training will plateau, then shrink. Computer. 2022;55(7):18-28. DOI: 10.1109/MC.2022.3148714

Luccioni S, Jernite Y, Strubell E. Power-hungry processing: watts driving the cost of AI deployment? In: Proceedings of the 2024 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency (FAccT '24). New York: ACM; 2024. p. 85- 99. DOI: 10.1145/3630106.3658542