Spatial Variability of Rainfall and Classification of Peninsular Indian Catchments
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
The strength and success of hydrological analysis depend upon the quantity and quality of observed data. In the recent past, the availability of advanced computing facilities and measurement techniques had a great impact on the field of hydrology, especially in hydrologic analysis and hydrologic modeling. In spite of such growth, the present hydrologic modeling has certain challenges: complexity (involving a large number of parameters), applicability to a specific region (difficult to generalize for other regions), and lack of understanding of the connection between model theories and the actual system. The general solution of simplifying the models in terms of developing a classification framework has been discussed and focused on in the present study. It will greatly help to overcome the hydrologic modeling challenges and provides a better understanding of the hydrologic process. In general, classification is a way of grouping entities which has similar characteristics. The importance of applying nonlinear dynamics and chaos methods for classification has been realized in the recent past; since such studies provide exclusive information on hidden characteristics such as complexity, nonlinearity, dimensionality, etc. Of hydrological processes. The hydrologic processes are complex. In this study, information regarding the complexity is extracted by statistical analysis and linear methods such as Autocorrelation Function, and Average Mutual Information. 367 gridded rainfall stations over Peninsular Indian basins are used to investigate the applicability of different methods used in the study.
Downloads
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
How to Cite
References
Beven, K.J., (1989). Changing ideas in hydrology-the case of physically based models. J. Hydrol, 105, 157–172. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-1694(89)90101-7
Bell, A.J., Sejnowski, T.J. (1995). An information-maximization approach to blind separation and blind deconvolution. Neural Computation, 7(6), 1129–1159. https://doi.org/10.1162/neco.1995.7.6.1129
Cigizoglu, H.K., Bayazit, M., Önöz, B., (2005). Trends in the Maximum, Mean, and Low Flows of Turkish Rivers. J. Hydromet., 6(3): 280-290. https://doi.org/10.1175/JHM412.1
Chelsea Nagy, R., Graeme Lockaby, B., Kalin, L., & Anderson, C. (2012). Effects of urbanization on stream hydrology and water quality: the Florida Gulf Coast. Hydrological Processes, 26(13), 2019-2030. https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.8336
Destexhe, A., Sepulchre, J. A., & Babloyantz, A. (1988). A comparative study of the experimental quantification of deterministic chaos. Physics letters A, 132(2-3), 101-106. https://doi.org/10.1016/0375-9601(88)90262-9
Drosdowsky, W., (1990). A simple index of the second POP component of Southern Oscillation. Trop. Ocean Atmos. Newsl (TOAN)., 54: 13-15.
Fan, J., Yao, Q., (2003). Nonlinear time series: nonparametric and parametric methods, Springer, New York.
Fraser, A.M., Swinney, H.L., (1986). Independent coordinates for strange attractors from mutual information. Phys. Rev. A, 33 (2), 1134–1140.Gould, S. J. (1989). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.33.1134
Gupta, H. V., Wagener, T., & Liu, Y. (2008). Reconciling theory with observations: elements of a diagnostic approach to model evaluation. Hydrological Processes: An International Journal, 22(18), 3802-3813. https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.6989
Galka, A. (2000). https://doi.org/10.1002/1099-0682(200012)2000:12<2577::AID-EJIC2577>3.0.CO;2-J
Georgakakos, K. P., Graham, N. E., Cheng, F. Y., Spencer, C., Shamir, E., Georgakakos, A. P., ... & Kistenmacher, M. (2012). Value of adaptive water resources management in northern California under climatic variability and change: Dynamic hydroclimatology. Journal of Hydrology, 412, 47-65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2011.04.032
Giakoumakis, S. G., & Baloutsos, G. (1997). Investigation of trend in hydrological time series of the Evinos River basin. Hydrological sciences journal, 42(1), 81-88. https://doi.org/10.1080/02626669709492007
Huang, C., Li, C., & Shi, G. (2012). Graphene-based catalysts. Energy & Environmental Science, 5(10), 8848-8868. https://doi.org/10.1039/c2ee22238h
Hrachowitz, M., Soulsby, C., Tetzlaff, D., Dawson, J. J. C., & Malcolm, I. A. (2009). Regionalization of transit time estimates in montane catchments by integrating landscape controls. Water Resources Research, 45(5). https://doi.org/10.1029/2008WR007496
Holzfuss, J., Mayer-Kress, G., (1986). An approach to error estimation in the application of dimension algorithms. In: Mayer-Kress, G. (Ed.), Dimensions and Entropies in Chaotic Systems. Springer, New York, pp. 114–122. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-71001-8_15
Joseph, P.V., Liebman, B., Hendon, H.H., (1991). Interannual variability of the Australian summer monsoon onset: Possible influence of Indian summer monsoon and E1 Nino. J Climate., 4: 529-538. https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0442(1991)004<0529:IVOTAS>2.0.CO;2
Kurths, J., & Herzel, H. (1987). An attractor in a solar time series. Physica D: Nonlinear Phenomena, 25(1-3), 165-172. https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-2789(87)90099-6
Kyrtsou, C., & Vorlow, C. E. (2005). Complex dynamics in macroeconomics: A novel approach (pp. 223-238). Springer Berlin Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-28556-3_11
Krishnamurthy, V., Shukla, J., (2008). Seasonal persistence and propagation of intraseasonal patterns over the Indian summer monsoon region. Climate Dynamics, 30, 353-369. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-007-0300-7
Lauterborn, W., & Holzfuss, J. (1986). Evidence for a low-dimensional strange attractor in acoustic turbulence. Physics Letters A, 115(8), 369-372. https://doi.org/10.1016/0375-9601(86)90278-1
Luk, K.C., Ball, J.E., Sharma, A., (2001). An application of artificial neural networks for rainfall forecasting. Math. Comp. Model., 33: 683–693. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0895-7177(00)00272-7
McMillan, H., Jackson, B., Clark, M., Kavetski, D., & Woods, R. (2011). Rainfall uncertainty in hydrological modeling: An evaluation of multiplicative error models. Journal of Hydrology, 400(1-2), 83-94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2011.01.026
Murphy, B.F., Timbal, B., (2007). A review of recent climate variability and climate change in southeastern Australia. International Journal of Climatology, doi:10.1002/joc.1627. https://doi.org/10.1002/joc.1627
Makkeasorn, A., Chang, N. B., & Zhou, X. (2008). Short-term streamflow forecasting with global climate change implications–A comparative study between genetic programming and neural network models. Journal of Hydrology, 352(3-4), 336-354. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2008.01.023
Ntegeka, V., & Willems, P. (2008). Trends and multidecadal oscillations in rainfall extremes, based on a more than 100‐year time series of 10 min rainfall intensities at Uccle, Belgium. Water Resources Research, 44(7). https://doi.org/10.1029/2007WR006471
New, M., Hulme, M., Jones, P.D., (1999). Representing Twentieth-Century Space-Time Variability. Part I: Development of a 1961-1990 Mean Monthly Terrestrial Climatology. J. Climate, 12, 829-856. https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0442(1999)012<0829:RTCSTC>2.0.CO;2
Packard, N.H., Crutchfield, J.P., Farmer, J.D., Shaw, R.S., (1980). Geometry from a time series. Phys. Rev. Lett, 45(9), 712–716. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.45.712
Rajeevan, M., Bhate, J., Kale, J.D., Lal, B., (2006). High resolution daily gridded rainfall data for the Indian region: Analysis of break and active monsoon spells. Current Science, 91, 3, 296 – 306.
Singh V.P., Woolhiser D.A., (2002). Mathematical modeling of watershed hydrology. J. Hydrol. Engg., 7(4), 270-292. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1084-0699(2002)7:4(270)
Sivakumar, B., Singh, V. P., Berndtsson, R., & Khan, S. K. (2015). Catchment classification framework in hydrology: challenges and directions. Journal of Hydrologic Engineering, 20(1), A4014002. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)HE.1943-5584.0000837
Telesca, L., Pierini, J. O., & Scian, B. (2012). Investigating the temporal variation of the scaling behavior in rainfall data measured in central Argentina through detrended fluctuation analysis. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, 391(4), 1553-1562. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physa.2011.08.042
Wagener, T., Sivapalan, M., Troch, P.A., Woods, R.A., (2007). Catchment Classification and Hydrologic Similarity, Geography Compass, 1/4, 901–931. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-8198.2007.00039.x
Wei, W., & Watkins Jr, D. W. (2011). Data mining methods for hydroclimatic forecasting. Advances in water resources, 34(11), 1390-1400. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advwatres.2011.08.001
Xie, P., Chen, M., Yang, S., Yatagai, A., Hayasaka, T., Fukushima, Y., & Liu, C. (2007). A gauge-based analysis of daily precipitation over East Asia. Journal of Hydrometeorology, 8(3), 607-626. https://doi.org/10.1175/JHM583.1
Dogra, A., & Dr. Taqdir. (2019). Detecting Intrusion with High Accuracy: using Hybrid K-Multi Layer Perceptron. In International Journal of Recent Technology and Engineering (IJRTE) (Vol. 8, Issue 3, pp. 4994–4999). https://doi.org/10.35940/ijrte.c5645.098319
Sistla, S. (2022). Predicting Diabetes u sing SVM Implemented by Machine Learning. In International Journal of Soft Computing and Engineering (Vol. 12, Issue 2, pp. 16–18). https://doi.org/10.35940/ijsce.b3557.0512222
Rani, Dr. Y. U., Kotturi, L. S., & Sudhakar, Dr. G. (2021). A Deep Learning Technique for Classification of Breast Cancer Disease. In International Journal of Engineering and Advanced Technology (Vol. 11, Issue 1, pp. 9–14). https://doi.org/10.35940/ijeat.a3119.1011121